Why Professional Skills Drive Strategy Execution
- Gontse Riet
- 13 hours ago
- 2 min read
Professional Skills Are Not Soft Skills
When organisations struggle to execute priorities, the response often starts with changing structures, targets, KPIs or reporting lines. But some of the most persistent challenges show up in calendars, conversations, and meetings that fail to close. Work isn’t done in theory or on paper. It happens in everyday human interactions.
That’s why time management, negotiation, and conflict resolution, often mislabelled as ‘soft skills’, are actually core organisational capabilities. They form the infrastructure through which execution happens.
Behaviour Sits at the Centre of Execution
The separation of strategy and execution is a persistent myth.
The idea that execution and planning are separate is widespread, but research suggests this is misleading. In The Execution Trap (Harvard Business Review), Roger L. Martin argues that dividing planning from execution undermines performance because it ignores how strategic intent flows through thousands of behavioural decisions across an organisation.
Similarly, in Why Strategy Execution Unravels — and What to Do About It, Donald Sull, Rebecca Homkes, and Charles Sull (Harvard Business Review) state that organisations have strong alignment processes but still struggle because coordination across teams, clarity in decision-making, and consistent decision follow-through drive execution success.
These are people-centric activities.
Execution Is Behavioural, Not Merely Structural
Execution happens in everyday choices:
How work gets prioritised in a crowded calendar
How disagreement is handled in real time
How cross-functional trade-offs are negotiated
How decisions are reinforced rather than reopened
Research from MIT Sloan Management Review consistently emphasises that coordination routines, decision clarity, and behavioural consistency are what convert plans into outcomes.
When these behaviours are inconsistent or unsupported, even well-designed plans falter.
Leadership & Capability Matter
Insights from McKinsey & Company reinforce that execution success is strongly correlated with leadership capability and organisational discipline, including clear decision structures and collaborative behaviours. Leaders who invest in human capability create organisations that deliver consistently, not because individuals work harder, but because teams work better together.
Time Isn’t Just Personal, It’s Organisational
A McKinsey report on middle managers highlights how time is spent in practice: nearly half of managers’ time is devoted to administrative tasks rather than people leadership.
Allocating time to what truly matters — like coaching, negotiation, and conflict resolution — requires organisational design choices, not just ‘better calendars’.
Professional skills are how people keep work moving forward when conditions are complex and pressure is high.
The Pinnacle Perspective
At Pinnacle Business Hub, we view time management, negotiation, and conflict resolution as core execution capabilities — the daily behavioural patterns that determine whether strategy translates into performance.
Our work focuses on:
Clarifying decision rights and accountability
Strengthening behaviour-driven capability systems
Embedding execution routines aligned to organisational priorities
Designing leadership practices that reinforce consistency
This ensures that good intentions translate into meaningful performance.
A Final Reflection
The question leaders should be asking is not:
Do we have the right strategy?
But:
Do we have the behavioural capabilities needed to make it real?
Execution is not just a step at the end of planning. It is how work happens, every day, in the small decisions and interactions that define outcomes.
That is where sustainable performance begins.
Comments